Comments on: WOT white paper http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/ Architecting the Web of Things, for techies and thinkers! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Vlad Trifa http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-2153 Vlad Trifa Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:32:01 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/#comment-2153 haha, thanks Gus for the help! I guess we'll come up with a better definition soon :) haha, thanks Gus for the help! I guess we’ll come up with a better definition soon :)

]]> By: Stefano Sanna http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-2152 Stefano Sanna Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:23:48 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/#comment-2152 Very interesting! Vlad, why don't you publish it through scribd.com, so that we can embedded the document in our sites as reference? Thank you. Very interesting! Vlad, why don’t you publish it through scribd.com, so that we can embedded the document in our sites as reference?

Thank you.

]]> By: augustin http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-2147 augustin Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:02:00 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/#comment-2147 Hello Vlad What's the web of thing. Do you want help for a better definiton? ;-) Hello Vlad

What’s the web of thing. Do you want help for a better definiton?

;-)

]]> By: Vlad Trifa http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1954 Vlad Trifa Thu, 28 May 2009 10:17:47 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/#comment-1954 good point, Roger, thanks for that! We have that in mind, but for now there are more important priorities. The fact that the Web of things is totally just the Web, but with things doesn't prevent at all to merge these things. Ideas and links on that welcome :) It's just that we want to avoid going too much into semantic web at this moment, which is already the focus of w3c anyway :) good point, Roger, thanks for that! We have that in mind, but for now there are more important priorities. The fact that the Web of things is totally just the Web, but with things doesn’t prevent at all to merge these things. Ideas and links on that welcome :) It’s just that we want to avoid going too much into semantic web at this moment, which is already the focus of w3c anyway :)

]]> By: Roger http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1953 Roger Thu, 28 May 2009 10:11:28 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/#comment-1953 would love to see this stuff mixed with linkeddata. i think that is the missing piece for WOT right now. would love to see this stuff mixed with linkeddata.
i think that is the missing piece for WOT right now.

]]> By: Dominique Guinard http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1874 Dominique Guinard Tue, 26 May 2009 06:59:57 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/#comment-1874 Might be clear but still wanted to make it explicit, this is in now way a means to limit the vision of WOT but rather a short summary of the concepts at the root of our (the WOT community+you+us) Web of Things. Enjoy, looking forward to your comments! Next one to come: a WOT technical white paper for geeks, already started that one! Dom Might be clear but still wanted to make it explicit, this is in now way a means to limit the vision of WOT but rather a short summary of the concepts at the root of our (the WOT community+you+us) Web of Things.

Enjoy, looking forward to your comments!

Next one to come: a WOT technical white paper for geeks, already started that one!

Dom

]]> By: SpaceTimeContinuum http://www.webofthings.org/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1848 SpaceTimeContinuum Mon, 25 May 2009 16:49:39 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/2009/05/25/wot-white-paper/#comment-1848 Very cool paper! :) Very cool paper! :)

]]>