Comments on: Tim O’Reilly: “The next stage of Web 2.0 is going to be driven by sensors” http://www.webofthings.org/2009/03/16/tim-oreilly-the-next-stage-of-web-20-is-going-to-be-driven-by-sensors/ Architecting the Web of Things, for techies and thinkers! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: The Next Technology Wave: Robots [World Innovation Forum] « The SiliconANGLE http://www.webofthings.org/2009/03/16/tim-oreilly-the-next-stage-of-web-20-is-going-to-be-driven-by-sensors/comment-page-1/#comment-1235 The Next Technology Wave: Robots [World Innovation Forum] « The SiliconANGLE Tue, 05 May 2009 20:43:55 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/?p=225#comment-1235 [...] Sensors are now taking their place in terms of driving the next technology wave. Tim O’Reilly said something similar at his recent Web 2.0 Expo [...] [...] Sensors are now taking their place in terms of driving the next technology wave. Tim O’Reilly said something similar at his recent Web 2.0 Expo [...]

]]> By: François albert gandon http://www.webofthings.org/2009/03/16/tim-oreilly-the-next-stage-of-web-20-is-going-to-be-driven-by-sensors/comment-page-1/#comment-204 François albert gandon Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:03:25 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/?p=225#comment-204 Vlad and Dominique, Enjoyed reading your comments ;-D I'll send you more information by mail soon. Hope by the end of this week. I am busy those days/weeks... Vlad and Dominique,

Enjoyed reading your comments ;-D

I’ll send you more information by mail soon.

Hope by the end of this week. I am busy those days/weeks…

]]> By: Dominique Guinard http://www.webofthings.org/2009/03/16/tim-oreilly-the-next-stage-of-web-20-is-going-to-be-driven-by-sensors/comment-page-1/#comment-186 Dominique Guinard Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:14:26 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/?p=225#comment-186 Dear François-Albert, A very nice comment of yours! Actually as Vlad said this would be the ultimate goal. As a warm up we are currently preparing a white-paper and a number of posts going deeper into what we mean by Web of Things. This is going to include technologies and source code not much bla-bla but rather digging into the subject and getting our hands dirty! So stay tuned, this is only a start and your comment is rather motivating to move forward. Note that your idea of a community project is great as well and should definitely start once the basis has been discussed an posted. Dear François-Albert,

A very nice comment of yours! Actually as Vlad said this would be the ultimate goal. As a warm up we are currently preparing a white-paper and a number of posts going deeper into what we mean by Web of Things. This is going to include technologies and source code not much bla-bla but rather digging into the subject and getting our hands dirty!

So stay tuned, this is only a start and your comment is rather motivating to move forward. Note that your idea of a community project is great as well and should definitely start once the basis has been discussed an posted.

]]> By: Vlad Trifa http://www.webofthings.org/2009/03/16/tim-oreilly-the-next-stage-of-web-20-is-going-to-be-driven-by-sensors/comment-page-1/#comment-180 Vlad Trifa Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:03:08 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/?p=225#comment-180 thanks! yeah, what you describe is ideally our target. Gather a community of doers that build things, a community of designers that makes these things gorgeous, and a community of people that can turn toys into products and sell them. In the longer run, we really hope that when you have a wot idea, you come here, look for a partner in crime, and just do it! How do you see this take form? A wiki? an open blog? We don't really like the idea where everybody has an account and can post on the blog, as our main concern is to ensure a certain level of quality ot our readers, and at the same time avoid becoming mashable.com or alike where good content gets lost in too many posts a day. On the other hand, something like a diycity sounds cool, and I love the concept as well, but it hard to find a compromise. How would you do to engage more the community and allow them to participate? Please let us know! Thanks again for your interest! thanks! yeah, what you describe is ideally our target. Gather a community of doers that build things, a community of designers that makes these things gorgeous, and a community of people that can turn toys into products and sell them. In the longer run, we really hope that when you have a wot idea, you come here, look for a partner in crime, and just do it!

How do you see this take form? A wiki? an open blog? We don’t really like the idea where everybody has an account and can post on the blog, as our main concern is to ensure a certain level of quality ot our readers, and at the same time avoid becoming mashable.com or alike where good content gets lost in too many posts a day.

On the other hand, something like a diycity sounds cool, and I love the concept as well, but it hard to find a compromise.

How would you do to engage more the community and allow them to participate? Please let us know!

Thanks again for your interest!

]]> By: françois-albert gandon http://www.webofthings.org/2009/03/16/tim-oreilly-the-next-stage-of-web-20-is-going-to-be-driven-by-sensors/comment-page-1/#comment-178 françois-albert gandon Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:13:36 +0000 http://www.webofthings.com/?p=225#comment-178 Hi Dominique, Your blog is really worth reading : always great content. I am really interested in this new web. Call it "WOT", "pervasive computing" "ubiquitous computing" ... But the problem is I am marketing guy. The kind of guy who has worked in many web startups, spent hours and hours on the net discovering new services based on the Twitter API, willing to create his own super cool service. But the one who has no technical skills. Its frustration every day. As i said previously, i have spent hours and hours on the net discovering new projects related to WOT. If you want to make a difference (in terms of content) you have to really explain how it works. I mean like an Instructable would do. So many times, posts are explaining what those new gadgets do, but never go into the details (source code, step by step guide, ... are missing) Too bad. We (the webofthings.com readers) could create a new project web sonsor. Here is my proposition. (In the following sentences "We" is refering to the webofthings.com readers). _ We share and decide on what application of the sensor Web we want to work on. _ We establish one list of the components we need _ Every week (more or less ferquently) you publish one new how to. _ At the end of this series of posts, we would be the first community powered web sensor project. Let me know if you are interested. Hope you are ,-) Hi Dominique,

Your blog is really worth reading : always great content.

I am really interested in this new web. Call it “WOT”, “pervasive computing” “ubiquitous computing” … But the problem is I am marketing guy. The kind of guy who has worked in many web startups, spent hours and hours on the net discovering new services based on the Twitter API, willing to create his own super cool service. But the one who has no technical skills. Its frustration every day.

As i said previously, i have spent hours and hours on the net discovering new projects related to WOT. If you want to make a difference (in terms of content) you have to really explain how it works. I mean like an Instructable would do. So many times, posts are explaining what those new gadgets do, but never go into the details (source code, step by step guide, … are missing) Too bad.

We (the webofthings.com readers) could create a new project web sonsor. Here is my proposition. (In the following sentences “We” is refering to the webofthings.com readers).

_ We share and decide on what application of the sensor Web we want to work on.

_ We establish one list of the components we need

_ Every week (more or less ferquently) you publish one new how to.

_ At the end of this series of posts, we would be the first community powered web sensor project.

Let me know if you are interested. Hope you are ,-)

]]>